In For Surgery

A 103-year-old lady requires surgery for a fractured hip. Unfortunately she’s been put down the priority list. The family claim it’s due to her age. The hospital claims that it’s due to her general health. Both are probably correct, but what does it matter who’s right?

Either way the risks involved with an elderly person going under general anaesthetic are very serious. Yet they seem to be glossed over in the media. I doubt whether the lady’s niece thought through the risks before whinging about the health system to the media throng.

Next week we might hear that she passed away while receiving the risky hip surgery. It’s a realistic outcome. Yet the supposed disgrace at having to wait for her turn is all that seems important.

Perhaps there was a lack of communication. The risks involved may not have been emphasised. The delay not explained fully. So far she has had to wait five days. Some would think that she’s lucky for only waiting that long.

Even if the delay were due solely to her age, would that have been a problem? To me it shows a prudent surgeon wanting to be cautious. He probably has the best patient outcome in mind.

Good on Jillian Skinner for backing the health professionals. Families need to be more realistic about such matters. There is more than one person requiring surgery in the facility. There are so many variables with every case.

Of course it’s not good for this lady. She’ll be in pain. She should have been fed when delayed. But it’s the reality of a modern day world-class facility – demand high yet resources finite.