In politics it seems if someone is against a certain method
then it’s assumed that they are also against the desired outcome.
Example 1
I am all for technological advancement. BUT I am against the government’s
wasteful and negligent spending on the NBN. They bypassed a cost benefit analysis and were reluctant to
deal with the private sector.
Example 2
I am all for increased funding of schools. BUT I’m against it being regarded as a
silver bullet. Funding is part of
the solution while other areas like increasing teacher quality and principal
autonomy are ignored largely due to union pressure.
Example 3
I am all for a humanitarian program for asylum seekers. BUT I’m against a criminal making
thousands of dollars off each passenger to board leaky vessels and overwhelm
our immigration system. It slows
down the process for genuinely persecuted people seeking asylum.
No comments:
Post a Comment