“In Defence of Freedom of Speech”
edited by Chris Berg
This is a book created by the Institute of Public Affairs
(IPA). It was sent to every
Federal Member of Parliament and Senator.
It was also distributed to the general public at the same time.
Its intention was to illuminate various attacks on the
liberties of individuals that were being perpetrated primarily by the Labor
govt.
You can be sure that it was read by some of its intended
target as then Greens leader, Bob Brown, referred to it during an address to
the National Press Club. His snide
remarks about the book had no essence of truth in them. But that didn’t matter to him. Nor did the IPA mind that he
misrepresented their work. It just
went to show how set in their anti liberty ways the Greens really are.
It is one thing to have someone disagree with you. It is a completely different thing to
take measures to stop them from saying it, even though it might be true. The vast majority of criticism for the
current government has been absolutely justified, but they don’t like their
faults being pointed out so they try and stop people from criticising.
The book describes a history of freedom of speech from
ancient Greece to modern times in Australia. It describes why the various acts were performed and their consequences. It’s surprising to see how much has
been done in the name of liberty and also protectionism.
Over the course of history there were no groups that shone brightly
as bearers of the liberty torch.
In all eras there fluctuations in freedom and protectionism. Even Christian groups, who I thought
would be bastions of freedom of speech, had fallen for the protectionist
ideology at times. When liberties were
taken away it was usually due to the institution of totalitarian regimes.
What this book has shown me is that freedoms are important
and not to be messed with by any government entity. It’s a slippery slope when governments think they can mess
with liberties. It stems mainly
from the intellectually elitist ideology that you are too stupid to make
educated decisions for yourself if given certain liberties. This ideology is both demeaning and
insulting. I’m glad we have
institution such as the IPA that took on the cause of freedom of speech with
such vigour.
1 comment:
Whenever a government wants to stop people saying or printing things, we should be asking what they are afraid of. Further, whenever a government wants to make any restrictions to freedoms, we should be asking how they could be applied, modified or expanded by future governments.
Liberty is hard won and hard kept.
LB
Post a Comment