The AFL has a chronic case of fence sitting at the moment. In the recent Headland/Selwood insulting language case they didn’t punish either Adam Selwood or Des Headland for their part in the incident.
One has to be in the wrong.
Selwood reportedly referred to a tattoo on Headland’s arm of his six year old daughter and made crude comments. Selwood admitted to saying, "What's that sl** on your arm, I was with a girl like that the other night". Other alleged comments from Selwood are being vehemently denied.
Des Headland obviously wears this tattoo of with pride and took these comments personally and retaliated. Who wouldn’t react to such a disgusting comment?
Why wasn't Selwood punished for what he admitted to saying, which was still deplorable? Or if they couldn’t find Selwood guilty then Headland should have been suspended for striking after not being able to control his temper. Instead the AFL tribunal let both off the hook. Selwood’s case was “not sustained” while Headland was cleared of all his charges due to what the tribunal jury called "exceptional and compelling circumstances by way of provocation".
West Coast Eagles CEO, Trevor Nisbett, speaks glowingly of his player (on afl.com.au) despite his admission at the tribunal
There is the unwritten rule that what happens on the field stays on the field. A lot of what is said on the field the players let slide. Selwood crossed the line and all other players needed a statement by the AFL and West Coast Eagle as to where that line shall stand.
One has to be in the wrong.
Selwood reportedly referred to a tattoo on Headland’s arm of his six year old daughter and made crude comments. Selwood admitted to saying, "What's that sl** on your arm, I was with a girl like that the other night". Other alleged comments from Selwood are being vehemently denied.
Des Headland obviously wears this tattoo of with pride and took these comments personally and retaliated. Who wouldn’t react to such a disgusting comment?
Why wasn't Selwood punished for what he admitted to saying, which was still deplorable? Or if they couldn’t find Selwood guilty then Headland should have been suspended for striking after not being able to control his temper. Instead the AFL tribunal let both off the hook. Selwood’s case was “not sustained” while Headland was cleared of all his charges due to what the tribunal jury called "exceptional and compelling circumstances by way of provocation".
West Coast Eagles CEO, Trevor Nisbett, speaks glowingly of his player (on afl.com.au) despite his admission at the tribunal
"He's an outstanding character. He played for Australia last year. He comes from an impeccable family and has a wonderful record with charities. He's a long-term leader and his character is unquestionable. His record stands alone. He hasn't been reported at any level and he's a very fair player and is hard at the ball."At a time when the Eagles have issues with player behaviour the CEO is praising a player who admitted to insulting language. Surely what he needs to do is counsel Selwood at the very least and even suspend him for a game. Show the public and the rest of the team that these misdemeanours are unacceptable from anyone. Even those with a glowing reputation and background.
There is the unwritten rule that what happens on the field stays on the field. A lot of what is said on the field the players let slide. Selwood crossed the line and all other players needed a statement by the AFL and West Coast Eagle as to where that line shall stand.
No comments:
Post a Comment